data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92b0e/92b0e927cc6312c609bfab964d979920c336cb0e" alt=""
Not only does the film I have in mind fall outside of that timeline, it falls outside of the United States. The film is World on a Wire, made for German television in 1973 by Rainer Werner Fassbinder. It's the story of a man named Fred Stiller (Klaus Lowitsch), a computer programmer whose direct superior, named Vollmer (Adiran Hoven), on a massive project that involves creating a version of our world on a virtual plane, has recently died, mysteriously. Stiller is picked by the head of this project, Herbert Siskins (Karl Heinz Vosgerau) to take over, but after Gunther Lause (Ivan Desny), another friend and co-worker, literally vanishes just before he was about to tell Stiller why Vollmer was acting so strangely in the days leading up to his death, and what he believes Vollmer discovered about the giant, world-encompassing computer called Simulacron, and subsequently nobody seems to be willing to admit that such a person as Lause ever existed, Stiller suddenly finds himself quite possibly in the same deadly situation and broken frame of mind as Vollmer.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/024bf/024bfd00666472bed29ae5f44eb69039908101af" alt=""
World on a Wire is based on a novel by American science fiction author Daniel F. Galouye called Simulacron-3. It's a novel I haven't read, but wish I had, not least because I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around the fact that it served as the source material for both World on a Wire and Joseph Rusnak's The Thirteenth Floor from 1999. That film is a tedious mess; World on a Wire is a mess too, maybe, I guess, but a glorious one. Rich, even novelistic (the 3 1/2 hour running time no doubt helps on that end) in a way filmed entertainment of any kind is rarely able to be, and truly eccentric in a way that only films can really manage. Throughout Fassbinder's film, characters in the background, or even in the foreground, will suddenly turn vacant when they're not being spoken to, or in order to get from one place to another people will unnecessarily walk to the background and behind a wall, looping around the other side and back into frame. Then of course there's the Marlene Dietrich impersonator taking part in a cabaret act about Nazis, and the giant shirtless chef muttering about his patrons being "barbarians" and the like. The thing about those vacant faces, though, is that this is all groundwork for certain story reveals later on. It's not just needless oddity.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8288c/8288ced96d0a4bdf1aa4d8de0903a0f155491ae7" alt=""
As with most great films, I’m a point where it’s difficult to describe why certain details elevate World on a Wire over so many science fiction films, old or new. For instance, intriguing questions linger in my mind, such as “In the world that Fassbinder has created, where, or even what, is Rome exactly??” The lack of answer is appealing. Or on a maybe more abstract level, why was it such a rush for me that the ending of the film first cuts between two realities, or ideas of reality, both true, one disastrous, and then ends with a build to Gottfried Hungsberg’s simple guitar theme over the closing titles, a theme that reminds me of the opening of the Beatles’ “Sun King”? Such a rush that I was led to rewind and watch those few minutes again? I couldn’t really say. But it was indeed a rush, as were the preceding 200 minutes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0dbe4/0dbe40efd3a7095c9de711408f7a8f8d63a1278c" alt=""
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
World on a Wire hwill be screening twice at TIFF Lightbox in the coming days. First tomorrow, June 17, and again on Sunday, June 19. If you can, you absolutely should.
3 comments:
Well I'll be a son of a gun, I've never seen this. Can't say I'll see it soon but I will look to see it now... at some point.
And you know I'm with you on the sci-fi thing, both thinking it the most debased (horror would be but it's more popular and classic sci-fi/horror like the James Whale Frankenstein movies is weighted more to the horror so it ends up elevating horror a little more) and on it being very misunderstood. I swear, you could throw a laser beam in Kramer vs. Kramer and that's all it would take for some people to then qualify that movie as sci-fi. It seems any single, miniscule element that even slightly "futuristic" in design, and it's a sci-fi film! Not an adventure film or an action film but a sci-fi film. I mean, look, it's got a laser!
Yeah, this is great. And odd, and thematically rich, and just packed with wonderful images and details. As you suggest, lots of films claim to be about "the nature of reality," but this one really is in the deepest sense. I think it's interesting that it sets up this complex thriller plot that the characters seem to care about less and less the more they discover about it, and the more obsessed they become with other levels of reality. I see it as a very interesting metaphor for religious conviction and belief in heaven: worldly matters seem to melt away as the emphasis shifts to larger metaphysical questions.
Mostly, I love that it's such a visually exciting film with such weighty ideas at its core. It's not exactly typical Fassbinder (whatever that is), but it's certainly a fantastic movie.
Greg - You'll find this amusing. The argument I mention at the top of this post started (this all took place on Facebook, by the way) when I said that CLOSE ENCOUNTERS was another of the few, true SF films made in my lifetime. Another guy pops up to call shenanigans on that, and said CLOSE ENCOUNTERS (which he hates) is more of a fantasy film. Much closer to true SF in his opinion? PREDATORS.
Ed - Sheesh, your point about it being a metaphor for heaven is absolutely dead on, and more than likely something Fassbinder had in mind -- why didn't it occur to me?? It certainly ties in strongly with the final images, as the happy reality could function easily as heaven, especially considering the other reality we're privy to.
Post a Comment