Sunday, October 10, 2010

The Kind of Face You SLASH!!! - Day 10: A Small Tail Was in My Pants

.
Sigh...
.
Okay, let me tell you how I first heard about Carlton Mellick III. Actually, I can't tell you exactly. All I know for sure is that, many years ago, I was dicking around on Amazon, browsing through random books, presumably in my chosen genres, by authors I'd never heard of before. Somewhere along the way, I came across a book called Satan Burger by Carlton Mellick III. The cover of Satan Burger told me pretty much everything I needed to know about Mellick, and I imagine I wondered idly if he was of legal drinking age yet. Or voting age, for that matter. I'm not going to include an image of Satan Burger's cover in this post, because I will not have the good name of this blog sullied in that manner, but some of you are going to want to see it, and instead of being all superior and telling you to look it up yourself, I will include this link. However, be aware that this link is NSFW, and not because it's sexy and awesome. Whether or not you choose to view that link, I will take a moment to note Satan Burger's cover blurb, provided by one "Vincent W. Sakowski" (talk about a get!), which reads: "This generation's Vonnegut!" If so, then may God have mercy on us all.
.
Jump ahead a bunch of years, and I'm shopping for horror anthologies in preparation for posts such as the one you're reading this very moment. I find two massive ones edited by John Skipp, one called Werewolves and Shapeshifters: Encounters with the Beast Within and the other called Zombies: Encounters with the Hungry Dead. Taken together, these collections contain short stories by, among others, Ray Bradbury, Angela Carter, John Collier, Saki, Steve Rasnic Tem, Melanie Tem, Theodore Sturgeon, and Neil Gaiman. And both collections boast a story by Carlton Mellick III. That's some mighty high-toned company for a guy who looks like this on purpose...
.
...and is undoubtedly a massive GWAR fan to be keeping. Is it possible that I let a book cover and a generally snobby attitude cloud what I like to think is my open mind about such things? Was I wrong about Carlton Mellick III? Is it possible that he's actually a talented writer?
.
NO!!! What, are you fucking kidding me? No, not at all. But I have evidence now to back this up, as I read both stories offered by the two Skipp anthologies: "War Pig" from the werewolf book and "Lemon Knives n' Cockroaches" from the zombie one.
.
So "War Pig" takes the werewolf myth and turns that motherfucker on its ear because instead of the guy turning into a wolf he turns into a pig. And also it's sort of like The Running Man, but the movie, not the book. What happens is, in the future poor people can't make any money, but there's this sport where first you go through this series of "serum" injections that turn you into a part man, part animal creature, and then once you're enough of an animal, they put you in the ring with another manimal, and you both fight until one of you is dead. The winner gets money. The title character is the reigning champion, but he's taken so much of that serum that he's about to become all pig, and/or die. So his time's running out, and War Pig's son, Tommy, who's still all human, and is our narrator watches on in sadness as War Pig seems set to fall beneath the slashing claws of his current opponent, named Grizzly Titan. Meanwhile, War Pig's manager, an unscrupulous greed-monster named Mr. Crumbly, is trying to entice Tommy to begin the serum treatment himself. War Pig gets wind of this, and is all "Oh no you don't."
.
So that's your story, basically. It ends in a fury of violence, described in Mellick's best approximation of high school creativity:
.
Mr. Crumbly whistled and three of his fighters came up from the lower deck to protect him. A werewolf, a crocodile man, and a werehorse. But all three were quickly pummeled to death.
.
Not the werehorse! "War Pig" develops a surprising sentimental streak towards at the end, when War Pig and his son Tommy bond over the carnage and mend their relationship, which has been fractured ever since the dad started to try to become a pig. But I'd like to break away from my analysis of "War Pig" and focus on this serum treatment business. When Mellick cracks his knuckles and gets down to the task of providing us exposition on this stuff, here's what he lays out:
.
Every injection would make you a little less human, and a lot more animal. Which beast you transformed into depended a little on your DNA and a lot on chance.
.
So what kind of animal you become has nothing to do with the serum? Your DNA has more to do with it than the frickin' made up serum?? What does Mellick think DNA is? A bunch of human goo mixed with a mystery animal goo, unique to each person, so that while I might have a bit of giraffe in me, my brother might be part seal? I realize this doesn't really matter in a made up story, but Mellick seems to think it does, otherwise he would have left that inanity out completely. Which I guess makes sense, as Mellick is the same guy who, when describing the appalling conditions the poor live in, later writes:
.
After paying, I went to the nearby fire pit to cook the meat, passing a rat woman nibbling on her meat raw. The animal people often preferred the taste of raw meat, though they usually ate it that way because using the fire was an extra cost.
.
Well why the fuck don't they just eat it raw if that's the way they like it??? You dumb bastard, you just said they liked it better raw! Fire being "an extra cost" shouldn't even enter into their considerations because they don't even want to cook the meat! THEY'D RATHER EAT IT RAW!!
.
And speaking of all that, there's this other story, "Lemon Knives 'n Cockroaches". Never mind what it's about -- uh, it's post-zombie Apocalypse, and humans have devolved into filthy underground dwellers who eat zombies and also other humans, and there's these two people, our narrator and some chick named Alyxa, who do all sorts of gross things, and who live in this tribe run by this guy named Thomas who is evil and gay, and who eventually Alyxa and the narrator fight back against and kill, and then feed to zombies, but then Alyxa wants to eat Thomas, also, but then she gets killed by other guys from her tribe because they think she's a zombie and so they kill her the way she used to kill zombies, which is pretty ironic -- because in the story are these things called "lemon knives". "Lemon knives", we are told, are "sharp handmade knives greased with sour acids yellow in color..." Perhaps this is nit-picking, but in order for our narrator to know that the acids are sour, someone at some point in the history of the development of this weapon must have drunk some of this acid and said "Oh hey, it's pretty sour. We should call these 'lemon knives'", just before the acid finished eating through his face.
.
Then again, aren't sour flavors often referred to as "acids"? That's what the Food Network continues to imply, because on that channel someone will try some pork dish and say "This needs an acid", which often means "You needed to squeeze a lime all over this plate." So maybe all acids really are sour, and therefore, regarding the lemon knives, our narrator was making a relatively safe assumption.
.
Although, you know what lemon knives basically are? They're basically knives, because while a number of people are stabbed and sliced with these things over the course of the story's fifteen pages, at no point is anyone said to have been burned by acid. So maybe it's just a color thing with these people, an aesthetic choice. This theory is given credence by the fact that we are first told about lemon knives when Alyxa "opens her lips to release two lemon knives" into her hands. So they're just tucked up their in her mouth for hours on end until she decides she needs them, and then she opens her lips. Meanwhile, no ill effects due to the acid. On a related note, later on Alyxa is completely naked, but our narrator realizes "[b]y the way she walks" that "she has her lemon knives hidden between her legs". So she's not wearing a stitch of clothing, but she's walking around with two knives between her legs. Just...what, taped there? Or her thighs are locked tight over two knives, and the guy she's about to use these knives on doesn't think "God she's walking stupid. What is between her legs, anyway? It better not be two lemon knives."
.
Anyway, so that's what reading Carlton Mellick III is like. Better stories tomorrow, hopefully.

22 comments:

  1. Oh man, I think I cracked a rib laughing.

    Which is apparently considerably less pain then you went through reading these.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What do you wanna bet the author or a pal came up with "lemon knives" while drunk or high, decided it was genius and then struggled (well, a little) to find a way to justify it as the title?

    It's safe to say I won't be adding Mr. The Third to my library list. I find this sort of review oddly encouraging, as well as riotously funny.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Better stories tomorrow, hopefully.

    Hopefully that shouldn't even be in doubt. The possibility that there's worse crap being published (or merely printed out for cash) in books today is enough to make one welcome the imminent demise of the form.

    I should admit I'm only familiar with the zombie "story" of the two (if by story one can mean simply a buncha randomly strung together words and crudely sketched images with the sole purpose of making somebody go "Dude! Ewwww! Dude! That's like so sick, dude! You're like, a mad genius with words and shit! Dude!") However, I feel confident that I'm missing little or nothing, perhaps even less than nothing, by having not read the other.

    By the way, this guy and a few other like-minded writer types describe their deliberately "zany" hodgepodge of comic-book surrealism and sub-pulp gore as "Bizarro" fiction. Y'know, like they've actually invented something new and worthwhile here.

    And, yeah, ...Bizarro. Kinda says it all, really, if a writer's not embarrassed to be associated with a label like that. I guess "Sploogy-goo-goo-gorefest" might sound a little more dopey, but not much.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bryce - Thank you. One thing I didn't mention in this post is that for some perverse reason, before reading these stories, I actually ordered one of Mellick's novels (not SATAN BURGER). I don't know what's wrong with me sometimes.

    Frank - I have no doubt that something very like what you describe actually happened. Hell, the birth of "lemon knives" may have occurred just prior to that picture of Mellick I featured here was taken.

    John - Yes, Bizarro...I'd actually intended to bring that up, but I decided to completely ditch anything informative. It seems to me that Bizarro is just an attempt to ramp up another "Splatterpunk" (itself a ridiculous name) movement -- Skipp chose to include Mellick in his anthologies, and he was at the forefront of that splatterpunk thing -- but this time around nobody's buying. Well, except John Skipp.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I just looked this guy up on Amazon, he has like a dozen books, most with 4- and 5-star reviews. Sigh. Now I wish I did not know about any of this.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Will, I feel that I can gaurantee you that all of those 4 and 5 star reviews come from within the "Bizarro" community. Try not to let this get you down.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hey not to be Mr. Recommend's things late in the game, but have you considered doing a bit of "John Dies At The End"? It's horror comedy done right.

    It's a novel, but it was originally released online in serial form and I'll bet it's still there, so it could work...

    ReplyDelete
  8. I already have that book, Bryce, and though I want to read it (otherwise I would have a copy, obviously) for some reason I never considered reading it for this project. And frankly I don't think I'd have the time. I barely have any time to devote to novels during all this.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Can I confess I wouldn't run from the literary term "Bizarro" on the face of it? Sure, it's kind of meaningless and dull. I'm hardly in line to become a member of this movement based on the name, and clearly not based on what I now know about its membership, but it hardly sounds like something I'd make an effort to shed.

    Mind you, it sounds like if they were literate and/or anywhere near as courageous as they want to appear, they'd have gone with the Harlan Ellison coined "bugfuck".

    But it's my experience with the self-consciously outrageous is that they're not really very courageous or creative, so they would hardly be deserving of such a title.

    Mind you, if there was a "bugfuck" literary movement, I'd do nearly anything to be a part of it... even if it already sucked.

    I almost want to read Mr. Mellick's work now just to have my own opinion, but I'm so far behind on reading things that don't sound ridiculous that I won't bother.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Bizarro is more of a comedy genre, not a gore genre.

    You might want to read this:

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/booksblog/2010/jul/16/bizarro-fiction-terribly-good

    and this:

    http://www.fantasy-magazine.com/2010/04/bizarro-fiction-101-not-just-weird-for-weirds-sake/

    Mellick might have his flaws and he might not be to your taste, but he is pretty successful and respected if you can believe it. He's got a pretty massive following, sells tons of books, has made a living as a writer since he was 20, been published in Year's Best anthologies, been translated into several languages, he's a Clarion graduate, and has been praised by people like Cory Doctorow, Chuck Palahniuk, Christopher Moore, John Skipp, Brian Keene, and I think even David Lynch.

    He does make you want to hate him (due to his titles, covers, and author photos) and the flaws in his work are easy to find, but he also has a lot of strengths and the people who love his work praise him up and down. Yeah, I'm sure some of his good reviews are from his bizarro friends, but that happens with all authors in all genres. Writers try to support each other.

    I'm not saying that any of you should go out and read his work. It's impossible to like something that you want to hate. Plus, it's probably not your thing anyway. I'm just saying that you're probably judging the author and the genre a little too harshly, too quickly.

    ReplyDelete
  11. It's not that I want to hate Mellick's writing; it's that I do hate Mellick's writing. Whatever commercial success (and whatever college he graduated from) is completely beside the point, when I actually read the words on the page.

    Praise from Brian Keene does not impress me, as I don't think much of Brian Keene's fiction. I'm a fan of David Lynch, but the idea that he might possibly, who knows, have praised Mellick doesn't impress me either. For one thing, Lynch praised LOOSE CHANGE. For another thing, I read these stories all by myself, and I did not like them at all, either as horror or as comedy.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Oh yeah, Lemon Knives are real things. Goggle something before you make yourself look even stupider next time.

    ReplyDelete
  13. My comment on his appearance may have been cheap, but I didn't insult his writing based on that. I insulted his writing based on his writing.

    The realness of "lemon knives" does not make their use in his story any less weak, or poorly written.

    ReplyDelete
  14. By the way, I "Goggled" "lemon knives", and all I found were references to your -- excuse me, his -- story. And also some baking sites.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Bill, of course, needs no help defending his review but I would just like to concur that, indeed, Bill's criticism of Mellick's writing is quite clearly based on his writing, not a personal dislike of the man. He even provides samples from Mellick's writing and then critiques them. So...

    Also, right now, I have two orange spoons hidden between my shoulder blades, and a third wedged between my molars and gums.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Greg, I have an apple spork, and last night I put it...well, forget it. The point is, they're real things.

    Jryan - Nice try, jack-ass!

    ReplyDelete
  17. First off, I want to mention that I am the 1st anonymous person, not the 2nd or 3rd anonymous people. I only posted the one comment.

    Second off, I'm not trying to argue against your opinion. I think your criticisms of these two stories are fair and valid. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe you didn't want to hate his work before you read it and went into it with an open mind. I'm not going to dwell on it.

    I was just arguing that he isn't the bad writer you make him out to be. Perhaps in your definition of "bad writing" he is a bad writer, but according to thousands of people's (including top authors and editors) definitions of "great writing" he is considered a great writer. That's why he keeps getting published, that's why he keeps selling books. I'm not trying to impress you with these names. It doesn't really matter to me.

    I'm not sure if anyone here is an aspiring writer, but if you are I recommend analyzing what is right about these stories as well as what is wrong. He is good enough to get published in big places. That means his work has value that you are not seeing, which is likely due to a lack of writing knowledge on your end. I don't mean this as an attack, because all writers are lacking in one area or another no matter who they are.

    >>Also, right now, I have two orange spoons hidden between my shoulder blades, and a third wedged between my molars and gums.<<


    I know this was meant to be a joke, but I think it's great. Most of Mellick's work is on the surreal side. It's not uncommon for characters in his stories to pull knives out of their eyebrows or replace their arms with windmills or have an infestation of miniature pirates. Personally, I think this kind of thing is interesting. Perhaps you disagree.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I recommend reading this piece of flash fiction by Mellick:

    http://www.viceland.com/int/v15n12/htdocs/candy-coated-401.php

    It is a better example of what bizarro fiction is all about. Surreal comedy.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Oddly, I was, as I said, almost tempted to check out this fella for myself, but his "defenders" kinda turned me off from the idea.

    For whatever that's worth.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Neil, there's a link to a free sample just above your head, there. Why not give it a look?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Yeah, I've already opened that link... We'll see.

    ReplyDelete